FRENCH COURT GIVES PROTECTION TO TV FORMAT: SARANGA PRODUCTION V CANAL PLUS

 

 

 

 

 

 

About the IFLA

Recent news and press information

About IFLA Lawyers

How To Protect Your Format

Legal Information

IFLA Links

Contact Us

 

The Paris High Court has given protection for a television programme format under the law of passing off.

The claimants, Saranga Production, produced a format for a political docu-drama show entitled Crise en direct. The broadcaster, Canal Plus, one of the defendants, sought proposals from production companies for a new politically themed programme. The claimants met with the defendants and presented their ideas. Canal Plus then commissioned a different production company to produce programmes using themes and characteristics in the claimants' format. The defendants, Canal Plus, a production company and two journalists involved in production, were then responsible for producing and broadcasting a programme entitled C'est déjà demain

The claimants brought an action for passing off in respect of the programme C'est déjà demain. In order to establish passing off under French law, the claimants had to show that the defendants had intentionally taken characteristic features of their format, that such formats were of economic value and that this had caused them loss.

The defendants argued that they had independently developed their programme before they met with the claimants. They also argued that the claimants' format had no independent economic value because it lacked originality and merely used themes and characteristics which were commonplace within the public domain.

The court found that there was no evidence that the defendants had already developed their programme before meeting the claimants. The issue of originality of the format was not relevant to establishing passing off, unlike in the law of copyright. The court also held that formats are "commercial products" with inherent economic value.

The court held that the broadcast of the defendants' programme had caused the claimants loss in that it had deprived them of the opportunity of marketing their format to another broadcaster.
The defendants were ordered to pay damages of 150,000 Euros and other relief was granted.

Although this decision does not provide any indication of whether the French court might afford copyright protection to television formats, it demonstrates that the court is willing to grant them protection via other forms of legal action. This is consistent with a general trend worldwide to give protection to this valuable species of intellectual property.

Jonathan Coad and Eleanor Adams

Film & TV

<< Back